• Post to the blog | 
  • Edit your details | 
  • Log in


Afghanistan: a futile conflict

Mike Phipps
15th March 2012 at 20:14

As the US soldier accused of shooting dead sixteen Afghan civilians is spirited out of the country to the safety of Kuwait, new evidence has emerged that more soldiers may have been involved in what could have been a premeditated attack.

According to some reports, tribal leaders in the southern province of Kandahar said

the killing spree had been pre-planned and was not carried out by a single “rogue” soldier. In fact, it was in retaliation against a deadly bomb attack on US troops in the area. Following the blast, the American forces summoned local Afghans and
tribal leaders of the region and vowed revenge, tribal leaders claimed.

Local witnesses also claim the number of fatalities was higher than reported and US troops burned a dozen of the victims’ bodies after the slaughter. Nine of the victims were young children.

The killing of defenceless civilians in Afghanistan is not unusual. Three were killed in Kapisa Province in early March, when five residents sitting in a garden were attacked by helicopters. In the same region, two bombs were dropped on a group of boys collecting firewood in February. Eight were killed. No weapons were recovered from the scene.

Britain too has been accused of covering up its use of remote-controlled weapons, which is one of the biggest causes of civilian casualties. Nearly 150 attacks by RAF unmanned aerial vehicles against the Taliban fighters are “secret and unreported”, according to a recent press report.

Civilian fatalities are not some unfortunate excess in an otherwise noble conflict. They are intrinsic to the war itself. In a piece headlined “Massacres are the inevitable result of foreign occupation,” Seumas Milne argued in The Guardian (http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/mar/13/massacres-result-of-foreign-occupation): “Nor is such depravity just a US habit, of course. Last year a hungover British guardsman stabbed a 10-year-old boy in the kidneys for no reason. British soldiers are currently on trial for filming their abuse of Afghan children, while US WikiLeaks files record 21 separate incidents of British troops shooting dead or bombing Afghan civilians.”

He concluded; “Massacres are common in wars, but they flow from the very nature of foreign occupations. Brutalised soldiers, pumped up with racial and cultural superiority, sent on imperial missions to subdue people they don’t understand, take revenge for resistance, real or imagined, with terror and savagery.”

His assessment that the war in Afghanistan has been a failure on every front is confirmed by a damning report published last month by a senior US officer in the field.

Lt. Colonel Daniel Davis’s opening sentence says: “Senior ranking US military leaders have so distorted the truth when communicating with the US Congress and American people in regards to conditions on the ground in Afghanistan that the truth has become unrecognizable.”

Much the same could be said here. We’ve come a long way since Labour Defence Secretary John Reid told the House of Commons that the extra troops he was sending to Helmand would be back by Christmas without “firing a single shot in anger”. While the Coalition may be content to send British soldiers to fight and die in a futile conflict, isn’t it about time the Labour leadership broke the chummy bipartisan consensus and started speaking up for the 55% of British people who want troops out immediately?

Meanwhile, life just gets worse for Afghans. A new report by Amnesty International, “Fleeing war, finding misery: The plight of the internally displaced in Afghanistan”, says half a million displaced Afghans are struggling to survive in makeshift shelters in one of the harshest winters in living memory. Around 400 more join their ranks every day, forced from their homes and land by the war. Like Iraq before it, this mission is a catastrophe - primarily for the very people it was pretending to help.

Bookmark and Share


on 16th March 2012 at 10:50, Brian Lynch said:

Lee has stated the case internationally and nationally very eloquently. I will just add that it is a failed US foreign policy supported over the years by the UK that has caused such carnage across the globe. A deluge of cock ups, initiatives by second and third rate politicians, supported by a huge arms trade motivated by sheer profit. Chile, Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan and a whole host of others, have fallen victim to these failed ideologies. The UK especially with its history of the Indian subcontinent and Afghan wars should have known better. In different times and with strong willed politicians the UK may have refused to get involved. Iraq especially was a complete disaster, and we see the outcome, a country still in chaos, but corporate america making huge profits. Wars were always meant to be a last resort after all negotiations were exhausted. We need to get back to that and fast, as we need to dump neocon hawks and corporate imperial culture. As for the US soldier who gave himself up after the killing spree, he is now in Kuwait soon to fly back to the US. His defence council has stated today the he was suffering from combat stress, and should never have been sent back to Afghanistan. This answers many questions raised in this debate, and points towards the plea that will be given in court. Not exactly any compensation to these innocents killed and the countless others over the years.

on 7th June 2012 at 22:26, Marie Lynam said:

Very good Mike

Comment on this post

Log in to post a comment